Fifa has outlined a strategy for financial growth that involves increasing the number of tournaments, implementing higher ticket prices, and utilising debt financing. These details are part of a 25-page sales document titled “Fifa Forward Enterprise Member Materials”, which proposes the establishment of a new entity to manage Fifa’s commercial operations. A 20% stake in this new company is intended for sale to Joshua Kushner, an American investor.
The prospectus, developed by JP Morgan, suggests that the four-year Fifa Forward payments to each of the 211 member associations could rise to $24m by the 2035-39 cycle. This projected growth is expected to stem from an expanded tournament portfolio, external capital sources, debt financing, and a focus on high-yield partnerships and events. The document also mentions a potential increase in the number of global tournaments held annually, from 200 to 450, which could significantly impact player workload.
Proposed Financial Strategy and Concerns
The sales pitch indicates that generating more revenue could involve staging the World Cup more frequently, a concept previously suggested by Gianni Infantino five years ago as a biennial event. Additionally, the bank’s proposal includes plans to “expand and optimize media rights monetization,” raising the possibility of selling television coverage for major events like the World Cup to subscription channels or streaming services.
JP Morgan asserts that Fifa is “undermonetized,” drawing comparisons with revenue figures from sports leagues such as the NFL, Major League Baseball, and the NBA, rather than other governing bodies. Fifa‘s reported annual revenue of $3.6bn is presented unfavourably against the NFL’s $21.2bn, Major League Baseball’s $13.1bn, and the NBA’s $12.5bn.
The document was distributed to all 211 member associations, leading to immediate strong reactions. One senior figure questioned the necessity for Fifa to incur debt, given its cash reserves of approximately $4bn and accumulated revenues of $15bn over the current four-year cycle. Another concern raised was the comparison of a global governing body with private, member-run leagues. The proposed timeline for the deal’s completion by JP Morgan has also been subject to scrutiny.
According to the document, investors are set to receive access to a term sheet and selected materials in August, prior to a vote by Fifa members. Notably, the prospectus provides minimal information regarding the investor group, including their identity, projected returns, or exit terms.
Reactions and Omissions
A significant omission in the 25-page document is the complete absence of any mention of women’s football. This lack of inclusion has been highlighted as a major concern within the proposed financial plans.
Fifa anticipates receiving the initial funding from Gianni Infantino‘s proposed sell-off plans by the end of October. All 211 member associations have until 19 September to indicate their agreement with the plan, with a simple majority required for it to proceed. The timeline for funding includes:
- August: Investors gain access to term sheets and materials.
- September: Investors confirm investment amounts and terms.
- October: Commitment letters are submitted, long-form agreements are finalised, and tender allocations are made.
- Late October: Investors are expected to transfer funds to Fifa.
The European football governing body is scheduled to hold an emergency meeting on Thursday afternoon to discuss its response to these developments. Uefa has maintained its opposition, particularly after discovering that Fifa had sent an earlier letter to associations, setting a deadline of 19 September to accept the deal and an initial payment of $20m.
Many Fifa members, including the Football Association, have expressed anger at learning about the proposal to sell a 20% stake in Fifa competitions to private finance, led by Joshua Kushner‘s Thrive Eternal investment vehicle, through media reports. FA chair Debbie Hewitt was among the Fifa vice-presidents who did not receive advance notice. The unease expressed by Uefa has been echoed by the Asian, South American, and North and Central American Confederations.
David Bernstein, a former chairman of both the FA and Manchester City, suggested that England should withdraw from the World Cup if Infantino’s proposals are implemented. The World Leagues organisation, chaired by Premier League chief executive Richard Masters, believes Fifa is exceeding its mandate. It stated that Fifa’s responsibilities extend beyond the commercial success of its own competitions and highlighted that while a small percentage of professional players participate in the World Cup, the majority of professional footballers and their clubs cease competing during national league competitions.
The organisation also noted that creating a subsidiary body to control Fifa’s commercial activities further accentuates the conflict of interest between Fifa’s role as a regulator and its function as a commercial organiser of major international competitions. The World Leagues Association has requested that Fifa withdraw its project and has reiterated the need for fundamental changes in Fifa’s decision-making processes.
Following widespread criticism, Fifa released an eight-page document explaining its rationale, stating that “too little of football’s growing commercial value has reached the parts of the game that need it most.” Infantino defended the plans in a video, describing them as “an offer, not an obligation,” and a “golden opportunity to turbocharge the development of the game globally.”
The European Leagues organisation described Fifa’s proposals as “a reckless and divisive development for world football,” asserting that “The World Cup should not be for sale. It is not the Fifa president’s private equity asset.” Global players’ union Fifpro urged Fifa to reconsider its proposal, expressing deep concern about transforming the World Cup and other Fifa competitions into investable assets for private capital. La Liga president Javier Tebas accused Infantino of attempting to secure votes before the next Fifa congress in March.
Hans-Joachim Watzke, vice-president of the German Football Association (DFB) and president of Borussia Dortmund, characterised Fifa’s plans as an “absolute attack on football.”
Source: theguardian.com










